The neutral child is transitioning to female in Virgo, by the END of Virgo the physical transformation is complete. Just like the virgin in the Garden of Eden the fruit is ready to be picked yet has never been touched, that is the physical purity of Virgo. This fleeting moment of physical perfection cannot last and the fruit cannot stay perfect whether it's picked or not, hence the Mutability of the Sign.
Virgo is literally halfway between the excess of Taurus and the lack of Capricorn, so Virgo must always be "never too much or too little but just exactly right and perfect" neither Taurus nor Capricorn but both. Virgo stands for ALL that is physically balanced, health, physical order, everything in its place, everything present and correct.
Then the physical cycle begins again A chart such as the ones found in Scorpio's page would be helpful to those who want straight-forward compatibility charts. This would also be useful on the other zodiac sign pages that don't have them, for one reason or other. Also, last time I checked, there was not even a section for compatibility on Virgo's page. Can someone fix this? In the first paragraph, reference is made to both the tropical and the sidereal dates of this zodiac sign.
These dates usually vary from each other, but here, each respective system is showing the same dates as corrected by the user Gemma Gemini without citation, as is so often and blindly tolerated by Wikipedia volunteers. This is a verifiable fact and yet it is in contradiction to information in the last paragraph of the page section Sidereal zodiac, another entry without citation. I am terrified of making corrections myself, as my input in the past with truthful and referenced content has been blocked by bullying Wikipedia volunteers, who were not able or willing to read and understand the finer aspects of written and evidently verifiable words.
Thus could anybody please reverse the entries by Gemma Gemini made on 23 July to show the correct sidereal dates for this astrological sign? Thank you. No, I am not a Virgo. On 22 October the contents of the articles for the individual signs of the western zodiac Pisces astrology etc. These edits were made by User:Dominus Vobisdu with the edit summary: Unsourced and unsourceable cruft.
No justification for stand-alone article. This did not seem to follow a community discussion. Following concerns raised at the Reference Desk I will, after posting this, restore the articles to the form they were in immediately before their redirection. At least some of the articles seem to have been significantly reduced in size also prior to this redirection, however I have not reverted these changes. An editor with more experience than I in Wikipedia policies may wish to move this discussion to a better location.
This page says that Virgos are born between 28 August — 28 September while Libras are born between 23 September — 23 October. So what astrological signs are people born between September 23 and September 28 under? Someone please fix this. I was looking for some information on what traits people of a particular star sign are supposed to have.
Now I buy the fact that it's not fact, but it is also relevant information. I've done the run around on wikipedia, and come back to where I started. I have created a module which encapulates values for the dates the Sun enters and exits the various signs; the data is taken from the U.
The Template:Zodiac date produces some erroneous results, so I hope to implement the change this week.
It is only practical to implement one date and citation style for the module and infobox, so it would be helpful if we can agree on what format to use for the various sign articles. Please discuss at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Astrology Corrections to dates, date and citation format in sign articles. Jc3s5h talk , 23 March UTC.
Actually the string "August 22" note capitalization occurs twice in the article, once in the infobox, and once in the body of the article. The instance in the infobox means that in , the Sun enters the sign of Virgo on August 22 and exits on September 22, UT1. This is cited to the Multiyear Computer Interactive Almanac and can be verified in any quality almanac by those who understand how to use them.
follow url Since a specific year and time scale are given, these dates are firmly established. This was discussed above in Corrections to dates, date and citation format in sign articles.
So various authors give slightly different dates. If C4B7:AEF0C:FBB expects to gain consensus for a different date, he or she should specify a reliable source for the dates he or she wants in the article. Jc3s5h talk , 1 August UTC. From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia. This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Virgo astrology article. This is not a forum for general discussion of the article's subject. That is, if you expect somebody to join in with your plans, take action.
Then, next time, tell them to get involved. The move by the communication planet, Mercury, into Virgo on your birthday accents the need to, first, review these matters for yourself. That, alone, will be challenging but rewarding. Next is discussing these with others. Few things annoy you more than those who avoid forthright discussions but, instead, use guilt as a springboard to make requests.
Instead, take another approach. In fact, things are getting worse.
This probably has more to do with the actual problem. That being the case, get involved. Everybody will be glad you did. As generous as you can be when things are going your way, recent changes in longstanding plans or unexpected events have brought out your stubborn side. Being a painstaking Virgo, you can sometimes get so caught up in improving on existing arrangements that you brush off new ideas without giving them much thought.
Not only is there plenty to explore, certain insights, ideas or offers could be amazingly profitable.
A person born on February 17th has a task to jump several steps upwards to reach the state of higher consciousness in this lifetime. Your weekly horoscope for February 18 – 24, ! On February 17, In Astrology. Your Weekly Horoscope: The Tuesday's supermoon in Virgo could hasten the process of change. Read your entire Aries weekly horoscope.
From that stillness insights will surface, about those issues and, equally, others. However, with the New Moon indicating not just changes but very real breakthroughs. At least explore what arises. Admittedly, they no longer work.
At least consider it. It would be no surprise if others are in an argumentative mood. Or, alternatively, it may be you who feels ready to confront tricky issues or difficult people. This is welcome, except for the fact that certain of the individuals are amazing stubborn. The challenge is convincing them to go with the flow, at least for the moment. The time has come to be tough. Some will involve longstanding ideas a few, and those that are most exciting, will be new and, often completely unexpected.
Explore it all, including what seems unappealing. Judging by the powerful links between your ruler Venus, Mars and the Sun to Uranus, planet of innovation, exciting ideas, offers and events have your head spinning.
Most Geminis are flexible.